A matter of life or death: why biodiversity must be taken seriously 鈥 now

Words: Peter Taylor-Whiffen

The landscape

The urgent need to slow climate change is well understood, but what鈥檚 less appreciated is the need to save the biodiversity that underpins it. 鈥淎s scientists, we鈥檙e interested in the opportunities biodiversity lends us, but also in the threats,鈥 says Matthew Fisher, Professor of Fungal Disease Epidemiology. 鈥淐OVID-19 is an obvious example of biodiversity gone bad, but it鈥檚 also essentially a marker of a much wider process 鈥 the world鈥檚 ecosystems are being rewired by the rapid environmental changes we humans are imposing.鈥

The challenge

Fisher points out that, as a planet, we鈥檝e been through five mass extinctions and we鈥檙e now in the sixth. Industrialisation and globalisation have put humans into very close contact with certain ecosystems for the first time, leading to threatening interactions. 鈥淚ndustrialisation is also changing our environments and we start to lose species either because they鈥檝e been eaten or there鈥檚 nowhere for them to live. How do we bend the curve of biodiversity loss to get away from that extinction rate?鈥

The solution 

Fisher and his colleagues examine the complex macro-ecological processes causing these impacts, often using libraries based on millions of DNA markers alongside in-the-field monitoring. 鈥淯sing big data genomic technologies, we can produce readouts of what鈥檚 out there, which enables us to set down very complex baselines of biodiversity. So we can tell when something鈥檚 changed, or if we鈥檙e losing species. We then try to translate that information into action the world needs to take.鈥

The collaboration

Key to all of this, says Fisher, is sharing scientific knowledge with people who can effect the necessary change. 鈥淲hen you understand biodiversity is being lost and you have some form of metric, you have to engage with policy-makers to argue why this is important. They鈥檙e the only ones who can change the trajectory of society, most notably through the use of law and subsidy.鈥

This was a focus of a recent debate hosted by Professors Fisher and Savolianen at Imperial鈥檚 Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, bringing together key figures from across the worlds of science, academia and politics. 鈥淲hen dealing with something as intrinsic as biodiversity you need all those voices in the room, you need the scientists to speak with the politicians,鈥 says Fisher, 鈥渂ecause otherwise it鈥檚 just an echo chamber. 鈥淓ncouragingly, there were no surprises 鈥 in that everyone recognised the absolute importance of biodiversity for our cultures and economies to continue. It鈥檚 understood that the problem of biodiversity loss is not an extreme stance or a hippy idea 鈥 we all understand that the ecosystem functions provided by intact biodiversity is an essential underpinning of a healthy humandominated planet. We all have some level of eco-anxiety because we all understand the scale and depth of the problem.鈥 

The future

Fisher says that there is widespread consensus that for the UK to achieve its net zero gains, it鈥檚 essential to address biodiversity. 鈥淭he two key processes 鈥 the need to decarbonise our economy and the need to strengthen our biodiversity and its ecosystem functionings 鈥 are interlinked, but scientists are consistently saying it鈥檚 not happening fast enough. 鈥淧eople are realising the link, however. After the summer we had 鈥 a 1 in 500-year drought 鈥 I doubt the public would push back against policies to preserve biodiversity. People have seen shrubs dying and biodiversity lost in their own gardens. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a massive challenge but I鈥檓 optimistic. I believe in the angels of our better nature, that humans essentially will accept sacrifices for the greater good. We鈥檙e locked into some pretty desperate trajectories, but we will win through.鈥 

Professor Matthew Fisher is Professor of Fungal Disease Epidemiology and co-director of Imperial鈥檚 Georgina Mace Centre For The Living Planet.